4 ms·
Such OTA's by auto makers should be required to be reviewed by a 3rd party. A bad update can kill people. I assume OTAs for planes have a strict process define
by sschueller 3y ago
Such OTA's by auto makers should be required to be reviewed by a 3rd party. A bad update can kill people.
I assume OTAs for planes have a strict process defined or approved by the FAA which needs to be followed. Does the NTSB have such a thing in place or is it just the wild west?
- mikrotikker 3y agoBetter yet, how about some dumb cars where you can't be killed by software code... there's no need for all these computers in cars these days. Keep it simple stupid. I think they just want to inflate the prices so much with all these extra useless features to force unequal access to personal transport.
- JoeAltmaier 3y agoIt's all about cost-effective improvement in sellable stats. Getting a little more horsepower; handling a little better; braking a little better. Easier to do with software than some mechanical device. Conspiracy theories aren't necessary. Just regular competitive market forces will explain it.
- mikrotikker 3y agoIt's not a conspiracy theory when cars are so expensive whole classes of people are excluded from the market.