3 ms·
It has fluctuated over time, but has almost always been over the minimum limits (25/3) IMO. It is also vastly more reliable than our only WISP option in the ar
by licomo 3y ago
It has fluctuated over time, but has almost always been over the minimum limits (25/3) IMO. It is also vastly more reliable than our only WISP option in the area.
What I have seen is that the cell will start to fill up, speeds slow down a little (still better than our WISP and other Satellite providers), then the cell closes. More satellites launch, speeds go up, and the cell opens again. It's my experience, so take it with a grain of salt. I've had it since the original beta / before 100% coverage.
Most of the complaints I see are from people with existing cable options. It is not as good as cable/fiber, but a complete game changer for those of us who have had flakey connections.
- SECProto 3y ago> It has fluctuated over time, but has almost always been over the minimum limits (25/3) IMO SpaceX didn't apply for 25/3, they applied for 100/20. The rest of your comment matches my experience.
- licomo 3y agoI understand, but the original comment was saying that was worse than what was available to many. That is not true in my case.
- Coder1996 3y agoI agree. I have a WISP and it is shite. $99/mo for up to (but almost never) 100 Mpbs down. Charter's trucks are now running lines to my property and we will be switching to Spectrum as soon as we can. Fuck Adaptive.