3 ms·
Highly recommend actually reading the FCC reports. I know that is a high bar. https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-reaffirms-rejection-nearly-900-million-subsidy-s
by tekla 3y ago
Highly recommend actually reading the FCC reports. I know that is a high bar.
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-reaffirms-rejection-nearly-900-million-subsidy-starlink https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-reaffirms-rejection-nearly-...
I'm pretty convinced that this ruling was a bit horseshit.
- jupp0r 3y agoCare to summarize why for those of us who don't want to read the FCC report?
- jcranmer 3y agoParagraphs 30 and 31 seem pretty dispositive to me. Starlink has not yet been able to reach the required speeds, its speeds have gotten worse over the past years, and it can point to no concrete evidence to suggest that Starlink's aspirational plans to suddenly and dramatically change that trend over the next several months are in fact realistic. Not that the report points this out, but Musk's companies do have a long history of touting unrealistic milestones and a very short history of actually reaching any such milestone on time. So what's horseshit about it?
- inemesitaffia 3y agoThe RDOF has a testing and deployment timeline. It's supposed to only cover deployments under the award itself.