4 ms·
I agree on the gamification, but I think they are still useful. I mean this project has 18k stars that just tells me it’s popular. It’s possible they bought fa
by prepend 3y ago
I agree on the gamification, but I think they are still useful.
I mean this project has 18k stars that just tells me it’s popular. It’s possible they bought fake stars but at 18k that would be strange.
I think stars are useless for comparing a 17k project to an 18k project and anyone comparing that way would be flagged by me as not so smart.
But it is useful to distinguish something with just a few stars from thousands.
The challenge is that there’s not really a good way to tell what a successful project is short of looking at it closely and using it. I’d like a better measure, but this is what we have.
- alephnan 3y agoOriginally, Amazon was great because the most popular/reviewed products were usually the best one. The opposite has become true. For a while, websites like fakepsot.com that analyzed and rated the credibility of these reviews worked well. Since then, they've been gamed. I'm not sure there's been a successful service for analyzing Github reviews