4 ms·
the option being discussed at that part, the meta offering, only came into existence because europe mandated that users must be able to use the full functionali
by RugnirViking 3y ago
the option being discussed at that part, the meta offering, only came into existence because europe mandated that users must be able to use the full functionality of a site without tracking/personalized ads. The paid option was facebooks attempt to do that - the question is over whether a paid option follows the intent of the law.
Note the mandate is not "no ads" but rather "no personalised ads"
- robertlagrant 3y agoAh okay - that makes sense. But still - I don't understand why if one of the options is "don't use it", an option I exercise almost every day of the year, there is a legal privacy claim. This isn't a system we'd consider access/participation in it to be mandatory, like healthcare or government.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]