3 ms·
I can see why what's going on here is problematic and, sure, why not poke holes into, well, everything, that seems fun. I do feel however that, as a society, we
by jstummbillig 3y ago
I can see why what's going on here is problematic and, sure, why not poke holes into, well, everything, that seems fun. I do feel however that, as a society, we are unclear about our asks.
Making claims about the future necessitates uncertainty. Would we rather only know about factuals? i.e. do not tell me about GPT-4 until the very fucking moment there is an API endpoint I can hit?
- martin_a 3y agoHaving FSD in 12 month from now is/was probably _THE_ selling point for Teslas. I'd feel somewhat deceived if the CEO is repeating that over 9 years and not delivering.
- jstummbillig 3y ago> Having FSD in 12 month from now is/was probably _THE_ selling point for Teslas. What are your data points? Is the lesson here, that we are good, as long as we make sure that bold claims are not easily falsifiable? Again, I am not sure what we are looking for. If we are interested in punishing people for making bold claims about the future, do we understand that that necessarily means, that we okay with learning less about the future? It's a eat your cake and have it moment. I understand that we can meet somewhere in the middle, but as a rule of thumb. It obviously a trade-off. What do we want more of?
- Mashimo 3y agoI don't understand the comparison. What did OpenAI sell/promise before the release?
- bryancoxwell 3y ago> Making claims about the future necessitates uncertainty. All the more reason to distrust someone following up their claims with things like “I’m certain of that.” (February 2019)
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]