I guess my point is that the statement is best in class PR spin. It's a pointless statement to make since everyone captured on surveillance footage at the airpo

I guess my point is that the statement is best in class PR spin. It's a pointless statement to make since everyone captured on surveillance footage at the airport will be seen without a valid ticket. However it's genius if the airport wants to assert that the airport does in fact have a working video surveillance system without being questioned about it.