3 ms·
They didn't call it as it is, that's just the obvious conclusion the author of the article makes based on another source, they make up unverified safety allegat
by eviks 3y ago
They didn't call it as it is, that's just the obvious conclusion the author of the article makes based on another source, they make up unverified safety allegations
> though Babbitt admits that GM hasn’t exactly tested this in a controlled setting to see whether or not it’s true.
- kmlx 3y agoyou misread the article. they did: > Automakers see subscriptions as huge new source of income to be tapped, with GM alone hoping to make as much as $25 billion per year just off subscriptions by 2030. and the following quote is from a different part of the article: > though Babbitt admits that GM hasn’t exactly tested this in a controlled setting to see whether or not it’s true. specifically: > Essentially, the thinking is that if a car’s in-built infotainment system is good enough, drivers will be less likely to use their phone for what they’re trying to do while they’re behind the wheel, — though Babbitt admits that GM hasn’t exactly tested this in a controlled setting to see whether or not it’s true.