2 ms·
I disagree that this is evidence that it is "often" destructive - however, this is mostly a semantic disagreement. As you have pointed out, "destructive" is sub
by happytoexplain 3y ago
I disagree that this is evidence that it is "often" destructive - however, this is mostly a semantic disagreement. As you have pointed out, "destructive" is subjective. I mention in another comment that I would consider throwing away the contents of "a single one-line input contained in a prompt" to be non-destructive. It's not a large leap to the contents of a single instant message, whether or not I agree that it qualifies. E.g. if iMessage would throw away a large amount of text un-prompted, I would disagree with iMessage's UX.
I'm not sure you really disagree with the core of what I'm saying, which is that "Cancel" is the universal easy way to safely dismiss a modal prompt, and also, regardless of what word you put on the button, if it would throw away a (subjective) threshold of data, you should prompt the user.
- saagarjha 3y agoI went into this discussion with the suspicion that despite your ALL CAPS exhortation your opinion was not actually all that disagreeable or controversial.
- happytoexplain 3y agoYeah, I would characterize it as a genuine all-caps exhortation only under the qualification that I am defining the word "prompt" as a simple prompt, not e.g. a message-composing UI (but the author is talking about modals in general, so I was not being precise enough about my disagreement with the author in my first comment).