4 ms·
> I can't point to anything specifically incorrect about this reporting. Then your comment is a genetic fallacy. You're highlighting a potential motive or pote
by epgui 3y ago
> I can't point to anything specifically incorrect about this reporting.
Then your comment is a genetic fallacy. You're highlighting a potential motive or potential for bias, but without anything substantive to say.
- aluminum96 3y agoI absolutely said something substantive. But I'll make it even more explicit: Al Jazeera has an untrustworthy track record, and their unverifiable primary-source reporting should not be assumed impartial. This is only the "genetic fallacy" if you assume that the trustworthiness of Al Jazeera articles is uncorrelated. My entire argument is that this publication is systematically not impartial, and wants to convince you of a particular (Pro-Palestinian) position.