3 ms·
Should they act completely peacefully while Israel maintains settlements and themselves don't honor the agreed upon 1967 borders? Why is it wrong for one side t
by p_j_w 3y ago
Should they act completely peacefully while Israel maintains settlements and themselves don't honor the agreed upon 1967 borders? Why is it wrong for one side to behave violently but not the other?
- vacuity 3y agoI don't condone those Israeli policies, but I don't think terrorist attacks are a productive way to incite peaceful reform. There's no fair solution when one side is much more powerful and cruel with that power, but responding with violence sure doesn't convince people to shake hands.
- biorach 3y agoIt's wrong for both sides to behave violently
- ashirusnw 3y agoThe 1967 borders, as strongly as they feature in all discussions, were never "agreed upon". Even the famous UN security council resolution 242 deliberately does not define those borders. Every peace discussion has used them as a basis for a future settlement, but until that happens it's premature to call them agreed anything.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]