3 ms·
That's probably 50% or more of the yearly cost of those workers.
by sixothree 3y ago
That's probably 50% or more of the yearly cost of those workers.
- onlyrealcuzzo 3y agoNo - it's $37M - it should be less than 20% for sure. They HAD 5500 employees. After the layoffs, it could be close to ~30% - which is INSANE - but not as absolutely crazy as 50% would be.
- sixothree 3y agoI was calculating laid off workers at $70k.