4 ms·
Am I cynical thinking the opposite? I can’t imagine they got that domain for a song. Spending a pile of cash on vanity such as that is a real turn off for me
by voakbasda 3y ago
Am I cynical thinking the opposite? I can’t imagine they got that domain for a song. Spending a pile of cash on vanity such as that is a real turn off for me; it signals more flash than bang. Am I wrong to think this?
- nickthegreek 3y agoI’d be worried about the ability to be in relevant searches with a name so generic.
- otteromkram 3y agoI've never ever ran a query for "software inc" before. They should be okay. Plus, search engines usually catch up based in click-throughs, bounces, financial kickbacks (cough), too. Searching for Go programming language stuff was a pain a few years back, but now engines have adapted to Go or Golang. I don't use Google, so ymmv.
- conradev 3y agoYou are not wrong to think this – spending a pile of cash on a name is a big decision that you want to approach with rigor. We didn't do that, though. Our domain was available for like $4,000. The .inc TLD is intentionally expensive to discourage domain squatting :-)