3 ms·
Over here there are "consumer associations" that have the right to sue in such cases in the name of all consumers. That works quite well. Due to this tradition
by Fischgericht 3y ago
Over here there are "consumer associations" that have the right to sue in such cases in the name of all consumers. That works quite well.
Due to this traditionally those things are not even tried.
That has changed with (mostly US) businesses entering the EU. A good example is booking.com, who again and again and again invented new dark patterns to then get sued for it, making it clear those are illegal.
We had the same with the airline industry with their advertised prices not matching the actual final price with all taxes and made-up fees. But by now even Ryanair has given up and no longer tries those tactics.
But there are no big financial penalties for losing such cases in court. I guess it's the bad PR these court cases generate every time that makes those businesses after a while giving up trying to screw over consumers...
- pyuser583 3y agoIn the US we have class actions (groups of aggrieved consumers). And States Attorney Generals who sue on behalf of the public. The problem is most lawsuits end in plea deals, so it matters greatly who the specific litigants are, as they have to ability to agree to a compromise that affects everybody. That’s why many conservatives (and only slightly fewer liberals) are “standing hawks” - people who think only folks with very specific harms should be part of lawsuit.