3 ms·
With that logic, why not just provide an API. Everybody just hack together their own client. Being a hacker doesn't mean you never get to benefit from prior wor
by mr_mitm 3y ago
With that logic, why not just provide an API. Everybody just hack together their own client. Being a hacker doesn't mean you never get to benefit from prior work, or never work together on something, or never share your work.
I get the appeal of providing a minimal service like HN, but unless I'm missing something, my proposed change is an absolute no-brainer considering it's effort-reward ratio.
- dredmorbius 3y ago<https://github.com/HackerNews/API https://github.com/HackerNews/API> Linked under "API" at the bottom of the page you're reading now.
- mr_mitm 3y agoEmphasis was on "just", as in: no web client.
- dredmorbius 3y agoThat seems an unreasonable expectation. There are and were message- and discussion-oriented protocols, most notably Usenet, of which you may be aware there were some persistent issues: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36194941 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36194941> <https://web.archive.org/web/20220321105208/https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/3c3xyu/why_usenet_died/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220321105208/https://old.reddi...> The thought's occurred to me that among the conspicuous omissions from the HTML spec is of a threaded discussion (or more specifically, messages within a threaded context) as a first-order object, permitting arbitrary structuring of that content at the volition of the reader.
- dredmorbius 3y agoThough on reflection: if you're really interested in a technical discussion site, the speedbump of needing to code (or at least install) your own client might make for an interesting form of gating. To that extent, your suggestion's somewhat growing on me.