4 ms·
Right, but when a schoolbook-writer doesn’t know something, they don’t just make up an outrageous lie. Not saying LLMs don’t have a place in education, but they
by lobsterthief 3y ago
Right, but when a schoolbook-writer doesn’t know something, they don’t just make up an outrageous lie. Not saying LLMs don’t have a place in education, but they have a long way to go.
- pixl97 3y agoFeynman would have disagreed with you https://www.rangevoting.org/FeynTexts.html https://www.rangevoting.org/FeynTexts.html >The reason was that the books were so lousy. They were false. They were hurried. They would try to be rigorous, but they would use examples (like automobiles in the street for "sets") which were almost OK, but in which there were always some subtleties. The definitions weren't accurate. Everything was a little bit ambiguous – they weren't smart enough to understand what was meant by "rigor." They were faking it. They were teaching something they didn't understand, and which was, in fact, useless, at that time, for the child.
- dinvlad 3y agoGonna adopt this paragraph for describing LLMs
- Loughla 3y ago[1964] Not to be snarky, but education has come quite far since the 60's.
- Calamitous 3y agoHas it? From what I’ve heard about the textbook industry, I feel like it hasn’t.