3 ms·
>your own prior conclusions Oh please. Again it's my answer to the question. "[The difference is that this is] slow encroaching market takeover by artificiall
by schiffern 3y ago
>your own prior conclusions
Oh please. Again it's my answer to the question.
"[The difference is that this is] slow encroaching market takeover by artificially crippled products for blood-sucking rent seeking."
Hope this helps.
- gruez 3y ago"artificially crippled products for blood-sucking rent seeking" that's the point that's up for discussion, but that's just being asserted with no supporting arguments.
- schiffern 3y agoIf you're trying to claim it's not "artificial" or "rent seeking," feel free to make that argument. Seemed self-explanatory enough to me.
- ethanbond 3y agoMuch better. It’s a lot more obvious how insubstantial and emotional the “argument” is. Just bad vibes word salad.
- schiffern 3y ago> insubstantial and emotional I see you didn't take Econ 101. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking
- ethanbond 3y agoTell me, what specifically about this press release unveiling a new tire meets the definition of rent-seeking?
- schiffern 3y agoLest you "forget," the context of the current thread is this post[0]. Since this is what you're reduced to, I see real discussion is finished now. Thank you for contributing. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38611689 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38611689