Some say it would be more democratic to simply leave unpopular content online, and let it naturally wither by virtue of being unpopular. But what if the people

Some say it would be more democratic to simply leave unpopular content online, and let it naturally wither by virtue of being unpopular. But what if the people choose wrong? That is when the guiding hand of brands and advertisers must intervene. After all, they also have free speech. That they're better organized and command more money doesn't change that. Like all accepted the Citizens United decision, this is likewise beyond question - not only is it obviously legal, it is also obviously moral and necessary.