>He should be admired not fired. That depends entirely upon one's definition of "admirable". Personally, if the act requires one to be deceitful (eg, lying abo

>He should be admired not fired. That depends entirely upon one's definition of "admirable". Personally, if the act requires one to be deceitful (eg, lying about the fact that your writers aren't writers), then that's not very admirable at all to me. If that's what you find admirable, well... alrighty then.