3 ms·
It’s not like there was some centralized decision making here. It’s possible for the two cases to be contradictory, given jury vs bench, and a whole host of oth
by jzl 3y ago
It’s not like there was some centralized decision making here. It’s possible for the two cases to be contradictory, given jury vs bench, and a whole host of other reasons. I think it’s safe to say that there’s still a long road ahead for both cases, and it’s possible that one outcome will affect the other in the appeals process. Not to mention any legislation that might get passed as a result.
- nodamage 3y agoI agree that the cases are very different, I'm only speaking to the particulars of the Apple case here. That said I think the jury vs bench is a red herring here given that Apple prevailed at the appeals court level where there is no jury involved.