6 ms·
Ignoring the fact that this is a 1 day old account, why should I care that this LLM's bars are larger and numbers bigger? Is this corporate blogpost actually go
by sickofparadox 3y ago
Ignoring the fact that this is a 1 day old account, why should I care that this LLM's bars are larger and numbers bigger? Is this corporate blogpost actually good content for anyone? What is the appeal other than "yup, that blue bar sure is longer than the other color bars."?
- sxg 3y agoSeveral reasons come to mind: - AI regulation is partly based on the number of parameters - It's generally accepted that bigger models perform better, so counterexamples to that notion are valuable - Smaller models are needed for local, offline processing with current hardware
- GaggiX 3y agoWell, it should show that there is a new better 7B model under Apache license, something that will prove in practice.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoIt's fine if you don't care. Nobody needs to care about everything. But why post your comment? It doesn't add anything to discussion. For me I care about different companies reaching mistral level so that mistral or whoever is in top has to release the model weights else competitors will.
- sickofparadox 3y agoI posted my comment because I see a new one of these on the front page every morning and I was genuinely curious if there was anyone who cares about these posts? That's alongside the fact I'm almost certain that the account that posted this is a sockpuppet for the company advertising this LLM.
- YetAnotherNick 3y ago> That's alongside the fact I'm almost certain that the account that posted this is a sockpuppet for the company advertising this LLM. This is the worst form of defence. I still use Mistral as was clear from the last post. This model is not that good to make me switch. As I said I just want Mistral or the top model to remain open weight and so I want competition.