3 ms·

Show HN: Add stablecoins payment to any product. No signup required

12 points by knlam 3y ago

wrdsmsh321 3y ago
Thank you just went live with my AI Chat/Art site https://netwrck.com https://netwrck.com all the best Great Service. Interested to do a ICO with NETW token on the platform too.
ketzo 3y ago
This is pretty cool. I know people are generally cynical about crypto at this point — I certainly am — but I’m also enough of, I guess, a techno-optimist to believe in the possibility of a new “payment rail” for the internet. Good luck!
throwboatyface 3y ago
1% fee and it doesn't even give you real money? At least the old-fashioned "pay with crypto" providers actually cashed you out.
nerdbaggy 3y ago
No signup required to transfer money. Sounds like a KYC nightmare
- mtmail 3y ago
  Start with know-your-payment-provider. Who am I signing a contract with?
- ketzo 3y ago
  I mean, I think they’re intentionally avoiding any interaction with the traditional financial system. Super not a lawyer, but if you’re not even interacting with dollars, let alone acting as a custodian for customer funds… does KYC still apply?
  - ForHackernews 3y ago
    Were dollars ever exchanged at any point for these digital Chuck E Cheese tokens? Seems like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_dollar_(private_currency) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_dollar_(private_curren... or casino chips might be relevant precedents.
birracerveza 3y ago
Hate to be that guy but, typo: >Arbitrium Also, it looks like this is basically just a nice web modal to streamline stablecoin transfers? I mean, it would make sense if you also added direct payment using a CC for example, but this seems just a wrapper around web3modal that collects 1% tax on each tx. It's good if you don't want/can't develop at all, but that's about it.
- knlam 3y ago
  Typo is my bad. Thanks for pointing it out! Regardless, there are callback and analytic, webhooks are being considered without compromising user identity. Sure, there are a lot of things to do

12 points by knlam 3y ago

Thank you just went live with my AI Chat/Art site https://netwrck.com https://netwrck.com all the best Great Service. Interested to do a ICO with NETW token on the platform too.

ketzo 3y ago

This is pretty cool. I know people are generally cynical about crypto at this point — I certainly am — but I’m also enough of, I guess, a techno-optimist to believe in the possibility of a new “payment rail” for the internet. Good luck!

throwboatyface 3y ago

1% fee and it doesn't even give you real money? At least the old-fashioned "pay with crypto" providers actually cashed you out.

nerdbaggy 3y ago

No signup required to transfer money. Sounds like a KYC nightmare

mtmail 3y ago
Start with know-your-payment-provider. Who am I signing a contract with?
ketzo 3y ago
I mean, I think they’re intentionally avoiding any interaction with the traditional financial system. Super not a lawyer, but if you’re not even interacting with dollars, let alone acting as a custodian for customer funds… does KYC still apply?
- ForHackernews 3y ago
  Were dollars ever exchanged at any point for these digital Chuck E Cheese tokens? Seems like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_dollar_(private_currency) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_dollar_(private_curren... or casino chips might be relevant precedents.

birracerveza 3y ago

Hate to be that guy but, typo: >Arbitrium Also, it looks like this is basically just a nice web modal to streamline stablecoin transfers? I mean, it would make sense if you also added direct payment using a CC for example, but this seems just a wrapper around web3modal that collects 1% tax on each tx. It's good if you don't want/can't develop at all, but that's about it.

knlam 3y ago
Typo is my bad. Thanks for pointing it out! Regardless, there are callback and analytic, webhooks are being considered without compromising user identity. Sure, there are a lot of things to do