The title is completely misleading, and the article is incoherent, for example, arguing on the one hand that attempts to discredit Orwell are not at all attacks

The title is completely misleading, and the article is incoherent, for example, arguing on the one hand that attempts to discredit Orwell are not at all attacks on his work, but also claiming that his personal failings made it into the book. And then claiming the 'right wing' are the ones 'coming for' Orwell? I'm not at all on the right, but in this case I think they have a very valid point, this really does seem like a fact-warping argument.