4 ms·
Or just moving the collapse button next to the vote buttons, so collapsing multiple comment branches becomes easier. Would not change anything the GP mentioned
by mr_mitm 3y ago
Or just moving the collapse button next to the vote buttons, so collapsing multiple comment branches becomes easier. Would not change anything the GP mentioned and would probably be super easy to implement.
- TeMPOraL 3y agoEasy enough to do it yourself via userstyle (for Stylus) or userscript (for TamperMonkey)? :). I'm currently using both - userstyle for DIY dark mode, userscript on mobile for font size adjustment (no Stylus available on Firefox for Android yet). Plus uBlock Origin configured to nuke the karma counter.
- dredmorbius 3y agoTrue. And though I don't have a relocated collapse control, there are modified light/dark mode HN styles linked in my HN profile, for those interested in either using those directly or as a starting point for your own restyle.
- mr_mitm 3y agoI could and probably will, but solving this on the server-side would be a huge time-saver for millions of users. Is there a RES-style browser addon for HN with some of these little quality of life improvements?
- TeMPOraL 3y agoThen again, it's hacker news. If the audience of this site won't individually hack the UX to match their preferences, who will?
- mr_mitm 3y agoWith that logic, why not just provide an API. Everybody just hack together their own client. Being a hacker doesn't mean you never get to benefit from prior work, or never work together on something, or never share your work. I get the appeal of providing a minimal service like HN, but unless I'm missing something, my proposed change is an absolute no-brainer considering it's effort-reward ratio.
- dredmorbius 3y ago<https://github.com/HackerNews/API https://github.com/HackerNews/API> Linked under "API" at the bottom of the page you're reading now.
- mr_mitm 3y agoEmphasis was on "just", as in: no web client.
- dredmorbius 3y agoThat seems an unreasonable expectation. There are and were message- and discussion-oriented protocols, most notably Usenet, of which you may be aware there were some persistent issues: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36194941 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36194941> <https://web.archive.org/web/20220321105208/https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/3c3xyu/why_usenet_died/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220321105208/https://old.reddi...> The thought's occurred to me that among the conspicuous omissions from the HTML spec is of a threaded discussion (or more specifically, messages within a threaded context) as a first-order object, permitting arbitrary structuring of that content at the volition of the reader.
- dredmorbius 3y agoThough on reflection: if you're really interested in a technical discussion site, the speedbump of needing to code (or at least install) your own client might make for an interesting form of gating. To that extent, your suggestion's somewhat growing on me.
- dredmorbius 3y agoOr search: <https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=alternative+hacker+news+front+ends&ia=web https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=alternative+hacker+news+fro...> "Alternative hacker news front ends".