3 ms·
That's backwards compatibility, and most languages give at least some consideration to it. Hare wants forwards compatibility, for which the equivalent statemen
by aw1621107 3y ago
That's backwards compatibility, and most languages give at least some consideration to it.
Hare wants forwards compatibility, for which the equivalent statement for Go would be "Go 1.21.4 code will compile with the Go 1.0 compiler".