3 ms·
Oh I see - I didn't understand that you liked it but thought it would be better appreciated elsewhere from your first comment. I think I'd argue that's at leas
by OJFord 3y ago
Oh I see - I didn't understand that you liked it but thought it would be better appreciated elsewhere from your first comment.
I think I'd argue that's at least partly due to changed attitudes about railway stations. In 1865 I think it would've seemed grander and more prominent, more of a presence while bustling about between horse-drawn and train carriage, calling a porter, etc.; today's stations themselves are not grand, we bustle in broadly the same ways but perhaps more busily, heads in phones, between machinery that moves more quickly, and what was perhaps once a fairly open free for all semi-square is not, from memory, a taxi rank and a road divided by the cross?
- vr46 3y agoVery true, the railway fell from prominence but in the last twenty years, London has been seriously revamping its stations to possibly recapture some of that old, well, prestige and glamour are probably overstating the drive, but certainly to make them more useful, robust, commercial and extract more from every square foot.