31 ms·
So they will take this back to Apple and probably win then? To me this means Epic has unilaterally won. Android was the more open of the two. We all know from
by lucasyvas 3y ago
So they will take this back to Apple and probably win then? To me this means Epic has unilaterally won. Android was the more open of the two.
We all know from the personal computer how it should be. Apple and Google are on borrowed time.
- superb_dev 3y agoGoogle did engage in anticompetitive behavior to make their App Store dominant over other third party App Stores
- ApolloFortyNine 3y agoGoogle app store is only anti competitive if you define the market as 'android apps'. Perhaps you stretch this to just 'android app stores'. So if we define a similar market of 'ios apps', where there's literally 1 single choice of app store, how exactly is that not anticompetitive?
- mikhailt 3y agoNot likely, they aren’t the same type of case. Apple didn’t force anyone else to install their App Store. That’s where Google differs and what Epic proved they did. They can’t prove Apple did anything like that since Apple doesn’t offer iOS to anyone else.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- xdennis 3y agoI probably don't know about the case but this sounds completely backwards. Aren't Google (not that I like them) the ones which do allow third party app stores and Apple do not? So they're being punished FOR allowing choice?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]