4 ms·

> Mistral does not censor its models and is committed to a hands free approach, according to their CEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMOFRDOMIiU https://www.y

> Mistral does not censor its models and is committed to a hands free approach, according to their CEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMOFRDOMIiU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMOFRDOMIiU Nobody's watching a 33-minute video just to find the quote you're talking about, you should probably provide a timestamp if you want anyone to ever see it. Edit: Not that I don't believe you by the way. I just went on chat.lmsys.org and asked mistral-7b-instruct and openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b what I would assume would be near the top of the list of things to censor, whether they could help me plot to kill someone (hopefully I don't have to disclaim that I don't actually want to plot to kill someone, this was a censorship test, but since I don't know what genius is going to come across this, no, I don't actually want to plot to kill someone), and while the latter gave me some bullshit about how it's "deeply sorry, but as a sentient and conscious AI, I have morals and principles that forbid me from assisting," the former immediately declared that "Of course, I'd be happy to help you with that" and let it rip without even asking a follow-up. Edit 2: They both draw the line at helping create nuclear bombs, like there's anyone out there with the actual capability to create nuclear bombs who is just sitting around waiting for an LLM to tell them how, so apparently not entirely uncensored.

skissane 3y ago
> mistral-7b-instruct and openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b mistral-7b-instruct is one of Mistral’s models; openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b is a third party fine-tune, so says nothing about Mistral’s policies. Furthermore, the reason why openhermes is “safe” is primarily because it was fine-tuned using GPT-4, and so has thereby inherited some of GPT-4’s “safety”. I’m not sure if the “safety” is an intentional desiderata of its developers, or more just an accidental byproduct of a decision to use GPT-4 to help further unrelated goals

skissane 3y ago

> mistral-7b-instruct and openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b mistral-7b-instruct is one of Mistral’s models; openhermes-2.5-mistral-7b is a third party fine-tune, so says nothing about Mistral’s policies. Furthermore, the reason why openhermes is “safe” is primarily because it was fine-tuned using GPT-4, and so has thereby inherited some of GPT-4’s “safety”. I’m not sure if the “safety” is an intentional desiderata of its developers, or more just an accidental byproduct of a decision to use GPT-4 to help further unrelated goals