4 ms·

You could say the same thing about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samba_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samba_(software)

• fahhem 3y ago
  Samba is a protocol, Microsoft doesn't have any costs associated with more users of it. GP is asking about APNS, which involves Apple servers and therefore costs Apple to handle more requests, however minimal per individual request/message
  • phonon 3y ago
    Support costs for Microsoft definitely go up.
    • jpc0 3y ago
      Explain your perspective on this. Here is a probing question. How does support costs for Microsoft go up when I communicate from my linux workstation to my linux server using SMB implemented by Samba.
• macNchz 3y ago
  I think Samba was my first introduction to the idea that using a non-official/reverse-engineered implementation of something to piggyback into a closed ecosystem may not actually be preferable to either shunning that ecosystem entirely, or just buying into it. I loved it in concept, but in practice not so much.