3 ms·
That's not generally true in practice. Especially when it is marketed to end users as a TOS-violating product and doubly so when it was originally a commerciali
by ethanbond 3y ago
That's not generally true in practice. Especially when it is marketed to end users as a TOS-violating product and doubly so when it was originally a commercialized product.
- pr0zac 3y agoTOSes are not legally binding so who cares?
- ethanbond 3y agoWhat is up with this meme around here? Of course terms of service are legally binding. They're a contract. It is possible to put unenforceable terms in a TOS, but it's simply untrue that "TOSes are not legally binding." What do you think is the distinction between a legally binding contract and a TOS?
- dkjaudyeqooe 3y agoYou say that, but what is Apple going to sue Beeper for? Tortious interference? That seems a stretch. In a similar vein: has any maker of web scraping tools been sued by a website? I couldn't find anything.