This reads as a bit incoherent, even if you skip Nazi comparisons so I may be picking this up wrong but: He's angry that a dean defended free speech on campus

This reads as a bit incoherent, even if you skip Nazi comparisons so I may be picking this up wrong but: He's angry that a dean defended free speech on campus by supporters of Palestine because ... she wrote an open letter saying she felt personally threatened as a black woman and a mother due to racist policing a few years ago? I'm not seeing the logical link there? If she suppressed someone else's letter about feeling personally threatened, that would be hypocritical but this just reads as a random political attack. Like she was guilty of wrongthink and so she had invited any and all consequences, even if it came as a result of protecting the free speech on campus that he's been asking for?