Not terribly in depth, but this is about the evidence I referenced: https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-technology-wisconsin-kenosha-homicide-b561bef68d

Not terribly in depth, but this is about the evidence I referenced: https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-technology-wisconsin-kenosha-homicide-b561bef68dc6aadaadc9b45a1bd93a19 https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-technology-wisco... IMHO any upscaling in court should be strictly squaring existing pixels, along with heavy caveats on how encoding works. A 16X zoom means one black pixel becomes sixteen pixels, and jurors have to know that the individual pixel may not have ever been an accurate representation of reality. Anything else, even nearest neighbor, is adding information. Especially with recent smart phones that are using AI to perform “super zoom” techniques you could easily magic into existence something that never existed.