i could agree with you. my pet peeve is that the name of the phenomenon where repeated executions result in same result (where same even includes unique identif

i could agree with you. my pet peeve is that the name of the phenomenon where repeated executions result in same result (where same even includes unique identifier) shouldn't be idempotency. especially in computing where, in my experience, any attempt to implement it involves some logic which checks to see if we've already observed the desired effect of the action.