10 ms·
I don't get what exactly people think is indicating an AI here, rather than a humourless and thoughtless HR rep. This is pretty standard formal business English
by vidarh 3y ago
I don't get what exactly people think is indicating an AI here, rather than a humourless and thoughtless HR rep. This is pretty standard formal business English. Have I managed to miss an actual strong sign here?
This feels like the dilution of "bot" where people have come to yell bot at any POV they disagree with without looking at the account profile.
EDIT: Amusingly, when I tried asking ChatGPT for a letter rejecting based on the birth date of 4/20 it lectured about the legalities and gave me a generic rejection letter that ignored it and would allow me to still reject the candidate for that reason, but without exposing my reason to the candidate so they could consider doing something about it. This, to me, if anything seems like the most likely safety issue with AI: Not that they turn Skynet, but that attempts at doing good will backfire into creating tools that are experts at circumventing laws and regulations and make dumb people far more effective at being bad.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> is pretty standard formal business English It's American English. There is no American HR department that systematically provides reasons for rejection in writing.
- vidarh 3y agoThat is a reason for thinking it is fake not for thinking it's an AI rejection letter.
- JumpCrisscross 3y agoI'm saying that regardless of whether it's AI generated or not, it looks fake.
- vidarh 3y agoThat we can agree on.