3 ms·
Nice! I like how it can double as a static site generator, so you can replace Hugo/Jekyll with this. That might need some glue code/extensions to the language t
by jimmyed 3y ago
Nice! I like how it can double as a static site generator, so you can replace Hugo/Jekyll with this. That might need some glue code/extensions to the language though.
- dgb23 3y agoHugo has some very hairy parts that make it very fast. I wouldn’t assume that it’s easily replaceable if you want the same performance?
- verdverm 3y agoHugo's speed is largely from Go. My problem with Hugo is how the templating becomes very confusing and the flow convoluted. The projects required places for various things becomes a maze, especially if you are not familiar with the site and theme you are working on. I definitely prefer JSX to Hugo, but this project might be a nice middle ground.
- Sphax 3y agoThat's what I did for my website. Combined with goldmark for writing my pages in markdown, I really like it. It did require a fair amount of code though.