3 ms·
I find myself thinking this as well. I love the idea of this for a few reasons, but there appear to be some hang ups that would cause me to go back to typescrip
by steve_adams_86 3y ago
I find myself thinking this as well. I love the idea of this for a few reasons, but there appear to be some hang ups that would cause me to go back to typescript, jsx, and a node process serving it.
The developer experience is ridiculously nice in that ecosystem if you’re accustomed to it. So many QOL things have been dealt with and polished.
But I do love the idea of something like that dev experience with Go instead of JavaScript powering it.
Maybe this would be totally sufficient if you don’t want any SPA/interactivity features?
Some sort of live pipe to component state like LiveView or similar could make it so a lot of JS would work implicitly, which might give a lot of the dev experience and user experience ease that people want. I’m not sure. But I do think something would often be missing with this library.
Regardless, I love the idea and I’d be stoked to see it grow and improve the developer experience.