3 ms·
This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but I've found this ranked list of llms useful -- https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboard http
by gregsadetsky 3y ago
This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but I've found this ranked list of llms useful -- https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboard https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboar...
Something more domain/use-specific would be great to have
- stavros 3y agoKeep in mind that the rankings are just that: an order of "best" to "worst". There's nothing on there that's an indication of how much better one model is from another.
- WhitneyLand 3y agoThat’s exactly what it does. It’s an Elo scoring system, like chess. By definition the difference between two entries represents how often it beats the other entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
- stavros 3y agoSo, GPT-4 beats the next best LLM. Is GPT-4 twice as good, or a hundred times as good as the next one?
- furyofantares 3y agoLooks like 62 points better, which under the Elo model implies about 59/41 matchup (aka GPT-4-Turbo is about 59% chance to beat Claude on a random prompt). You can look up an Elo probability calculator to plug in an Elo difference and see this number. For example plug in two Elo ratings here: https://sandhoefner.github.io/chess.html https://sandhoefner.github.io/chess.html - really only the difference between them matters. Btw the similarity of the numbers 59 and 62 here is coincidence, other differences won't be nearly the same as the probability.