3 ms·

> Is there a centralized list somewhere that tests "use this for x purpose, use that for y?" Yeah, "don't use these models for production, use OpenAI for produ

> Is there a centralized list somewhere that tests "use this for x purpose, use that for y?" Yeah, "don't use these models for production, use OpenAI for production, ignore Claude/Gemini/etc.".

holoduke 3y ago
Why not. For simple things like converting, translating its quite handy and the costs are with you. I use open models for removing backgrounds from images. Also use models to translate texts. Openai would be too expensive for my usecases.
PostOnce 3y ago
"Put all your eggs in one basket" isn't the traditional advice. Any one of these companies can at any time change their API, pricing, access rules, or even swap the model out for a dumber, cheaper one at the same price. You'll have no recourse if you don't have several backends available, or control your own. At a minimum, you should have available several hot-swappable backends/APIs if you want to remain viable in an indeterminate future.
- Der_Einzige 3y ago
  I want someone to offer a large sum of money to anyone who can leak the full GPT-4 model to prevent ClosedAIs lunacy. We already got a model leak from NAI and it forever propelled AI waifus. Why can’t some Good Samaritan take one for the team and give the world access to the closest thing we have to AGI? Whoever does it will be remembered even more positively than Aaron Swartz Why should I respect copyright on a model when the model training didn’t respect copyright? To be clear, I’m a copyright abolitionist so I’m down with not accepting copyright. I want someone to force OpenAI to be actually open.
lannisterstark 3y ago
None of this is about production. I'm not building anything with LLMs. (well, apart from a couple of IRC bots). Most of the reason I'm asking is to use them for personal usage. Not a huge fan of closed models in general.

3 ms·

> Is there a centralized list somewhere that tests "use this for x purpose, use that for y?" Yeah, "don't use these models for production, use OpenAI for produ

by behnamoh 3y ago

> Is there a centralized list somewhere that tests "use this for x purpose, use that for y?" Yeah, "don't use these models for production, use OpenAI for production, ignore Claude/Gemini/etc.".

holoduke 3y ago
Why not. For simple things like converting, translating its quite handy and the costs are with you. I use open models for removing backgrounds from images. Also use models to translate texts. Openai would be too expensive for my usecases.
PostOnce 3y ago
"Put all your eggs in one basket" isn't the traditional advice. Any one of these companies can at any time change their API, pricing, access rules, or even swap the model out for a dumber, cheaper one at the same price. You'll have no recourse if you don't have several backends available, or control your own. At a minimum, you should have available several hot-swappable backends/APIs if you want to remain viable in an indeterminate future.
- Der_Einzige 3y ago
  I want someone to offer a large sum of money to anyone who can leak the full GPT-4 model to prevent ClosedAIs lunacy. We already got a model leak from NAI and it forever propelled AI waifus. Why can’t some Good Samaritan take one for the team and give the world access to the closest thing we have to AGI? Whoever does it will be remembered even more positively than Aaron Swartz Why should I respect copyright on a model when the model training didn’t respect copyright? To be clear, I’m a copyright abolitionist so I’m down with not accepting copyright. I want someone to force OpenAI to be actually open.
lannisterstark 3y ago
None of this is about production. I'm not building anything with LLMs. (well, apart from a couple of IRC bots). Most of the reason I'm asking is to use them for personal usage. Not a huge fan of closed models in general.