4 ms·
I was referring to no license. I was referring to this statement > There is zero practical difference between "free and source available" and "open source" for
by vitiral 3y ago
I was referring to no license. I was referring to this statement
> There is zero practical difference between "free and source available" and "open source" for 99.99% of users.
"Free and source available" is not a license. Without a license it is copyrighted.
- pydry 3y ago"Open source" is not a license either. "Free and source available" describes a group of licenses including sentry's.
- vitiral 3y agoOkay, but "open source" implies you can change and fork the code. "Free and source available" does not, even if you can in some cases. That's literally all I said.
- pydry 3y agoIt sounds like you are agreeing with me that if you can do that then it's not misleading to call those licenses open source.