4 ms·
I'm not sure what's "irrational" about thinking humans are a blight and scourge upon the earth. Being "concerned about future human well being" is not inherentl
by catlover76 3y ago
I'm not sure what's "irrational" about thinking humans are a blight and scourge upon the earth. Being "concerned about future human well being" is not inherently more rational.
They are just different values people might hold.
- nolongerthere 3y agoIt’s always hilarious to see people say stuff like this, if you truly believed it you’d start with yourself. Or else you’d be planning mass extermination campaigns to destroy the scourge. Anything else is simply irrational or outright hypocrisy.
- rexpop 3y ago> humans are a blight and scourge upon the earth We call this ideology "ecofascism." > The prioritization of a white supremacist conceptualization of a pristine and dichotomous “Nature” [note: ie "the earth"] over the wellbeing of people, particularly people of color, coupled with a failure to acknowledge the differential responsibility of predominately white corporate polluters.[0] > For tens of thousands of years, people have lived in balance with our natural environment. Even early agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry was minimally destructive on a global scale... The burden of environmental destruction can’t be placed equally at the feet of all people. As a matter of fact, the wealthiest 10% of people contribute half of global greenhouse gas emissions! [1] 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1982744 https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1982744 1. https://www.bard.edu/cep/blog/?p=11973 https://www.bard.edu/cep/blog/?p=11973