1) Please tell me what you want me to read that has any impact on the point I'm making. I've read enough to make clear arguments about the parts of the paper r

1) Please tell me what you want me to read that has any impact on the point I'm making. I've read enough to make clear arguments about the parts of the paper relevant to my comment. Reminder: The original comment that I reacted to was this: "Recent recalibration of the limits of growth model has shown that collapse of industrial civilization is imminent". I have pointed out how the paper does not support this conclusion and would appreciate specific pointers to improve my reasoning. (Besides, "don't look at this part" is one hell of a defense of a paper... Again, you can't show dynamics with a clear physical time axis and then claim that you don't actually mean it.) 2) It's not growing exponentially. Exponential growth, even at 1%, would be plainly visible in any long term plot. Take this one for example, but feel free to find you own: https://imageio.forbes.com/blogs-images/rrapier/files/2018/07/Global-Oil.jpg https://imageio.forbes.com/blogs-images/rrapier/files/2018/0... World consumption is what I was referring to. The reference to advanced economies is because it is specifically advanced economies that have the ability to increasingly decouple their growth from energy consumption; the fact that oil consumption is not increasing there anymore is therefore significant.