To me, "Could there be something better than git?" is not the important question. What matters is if git is good enough. Or more specifically, is if git good

To me, "Could there be something better than git?" is not the important question. What matters is if git is good enough. Or more specifically, is if git good enough for X when X is something that is actually being done. I mean, git is good enough for my very minimal needs and the needs of people with much more sophisticated needs than mine (e.g. the Linux team). And since I know more about git than any other VCS (in part because there are better resources for learning git than any other VCS) learning another VCS for the sake of learning another VCS wouldn't help me get anything done. None of that means git is good enough for your needs, but statistically, it probably is good enough for your needs because statistically, most difficulties with git are related to training and knowledge since the mathematics underpinning git are (to the best of my understanding) sound. Which also implies (not accidentally) that being better than git requires better resources for learning the new VCS than git has, and that's a very tall order. Good luck.