4 ms·
If we stop fossil fuels subsidies, that will be the end of fossil fuels, no need to discuss and plan. Last year, fuels that drive climate change and pollute th
by thelastgallon 3y ago
If we stop fossil fuels subsidies, that will be the end of fossil fuels, no need to discuss and plan.
Last year, fuels that drive climate change and pollute the air were underpriced to the tune of $7 trillion. It’s hard to think of a more misguided policy: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-10-16/climate-change-why-are-governments-still-subsidizing-fossil-fuels https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-10-16/climat...
- rayiner 3y agoThat $7 trillion number is based on a methodology that counts not taxing externalities as a subsidy. I think that’s an economically reasonable way to look at it. But that’s not an appropriate definition in this context. Eliminating express subsidies (to make fuel cheaper) is going to be much easier in terms of “discussing and planning” than adding carbon taxes and the like to address implicit subsidies.
- ls612 3y agoIt’s also vastly inflating the external cost of carbon by using unrealistic discount rates and damage functions. The total externality size that DICE models find is something like $1.5 trillion per year, out of a global economy of ~$150 trillion.