3 ms·

Hey maybe you can get together with the grand unified pure pipeline dataflow functions theory guy and make some kind of HN self-help group.

• sylware 3y ago
  That was more than a decade ago. Nowadays you write pipeline generic assembly as a lot happen at runtime in modern micro-archs. If some static "optimizations" go in, it is mostly those who are likely to be "true or benign" enough across most if not all micro-archs, for instance cache line or code fetch window alignment (and even that...), branching reduction, etc. You can still have pipeline specific optimized assembly code, usually just a matter of installing/branching to the right assembly code path at runtime, hardly more. We have to realize than with that, the entire insane (the word is fair) cost and planned obsolescence of optimizing compilers are literaly... gone... and just for that, even if some assembly code paths are a bit slower, oh god, this is worth billions! But there is a pitfall though: if the assembly code is written using an ultra powerfull macro preprocessor, "c++ grade" (you get the picture), this would be a complete loss, at it is just displacing the core of the issue from an optimizing compiler to an omega preprocessor.