3 ms·
Looking at the screenshots, I find it really difficult to parse. Maybe if they simplified the prompt a bit it would be easier, but my focus is bouncing all arou
by JimDabell 3y ago
Looking at the screenshots, I find it really difficult to parse. Maybe if they simplified the prompt a bit it would be easier, but my focus is bouncing all around the screenshots trying to find the prompt. You’re typing in the centre of the screen not the left because of all that junk? What is the point in having status in the prompt if you control the window chrome and can put that status in a more convenient place?
It’s also kinda weird how they try to add styling everywhere possible… except remove the styling from the output of ls so you can’t distinguish between file vs directory, executable vs non-executable, symlink vs regular file, etc.
I really don’t understand what they are getting at with the copy either:
> The modern terminal that keeps your flow in line
> Keep development moving forward without the copy, pasting, saving, and exporting headache.
What copy, pasting, saving, and exporting headache are they talking about?
- TobyTheDog123 3y agoI thought it was just the marketing trying to show off too many features at once, and I'd really like a more workspace-centric approach to terminals, so I gave it a download -- unfortunately the actual UI is worse than the screenshots they show. - Sidebar that is either HUGE (and branded) or nonexistent (I'd like to see something like Discord's approach here) - Only UI settings are a font size selector - The input and cwd are on different lines for some reason (though it shows huge helper text inline with the input) - Weird borders and shadows on elements that are super jarring.