2 ms·> reducing its execution time by 7.03 times or 703%. Shouldn't the latter be by 86 % ?by tromp 3y ago> reducing its execution time by 7.03 times or 703%. Shouldn't the latter be by 86 % ?Archelaos 3y agoYes, but ... > The benchmark script previously took 22.2 seconds. I reduced it to 3.3s! this yields 85 %.xnacly 3y agothat is true, miscalculated on my side, maybe i was to ecstatic by the improvement