>I said they need to be aware of their own limitations, that is very well defined. You seemed to imply that this "awareness" was some inherent ability of human

>I said they need to be aware of their own limitations, that is very well defined. You seemed to imply that this "awareness" was some inherent ability of humans but it's very clearly not. If it were, we wouldn't be a lot more aware of these limitations today than even a few decades past. and if all the records we kept vanished in an instant today then the next generations of humans would be a lot less aware. This "awareness" you are talking about is little more than accumulated knowledge. By the realistic definition of 'aware of what is observed', i fail to see how LLMs don't demonstrate this.