3 ms·
He’s not mistaken, he’s just writing for the advancement of linguistics and cognitive science. If you’re interested in robots that’s different.
by azinman2 3y ago
He’s not mistaken, he’s just writing for the advancement of linguistics and cognitive science. If you’re interested in robots that’s different.
- AndyNemmity 3y agoWell said. Maybe I should have made it clearer, but I read the article, so I thought it was obvious in a thread about the article.
- jameshart 3y agoWell, the reason a lot of people were interested in computational linguistics and cognition was probably because they want to make robots, and thought that they might need that. Rodney Brooks certainly is interested in making robots in general. I guess if LLMs mean they might be able to get robots without needing cognitive science and linguistics, that's sad for the people in linguistics and cognitive science who have lost that audience for their work now?