2 ms·
>the recent paper on LLMs failing to invert logic (A is B therefore B is A) is one. That's not what that paper says
by famouswaffles 3y ago
>the recent paper on LLMs failing to invert logic (A is B therefore B is A) is one.
That's not what that paper says
- foobarqux 3y agoYes, we discussed this before. You are wrong. If the system can produce the statement A is the mother of B but not B is son/daughter of A then it fails to do something humans can trivially do.
- famouswaffles 3y agoThe system can produce both and the paper makes this clear for those who bothered to read it.
- foobarqux 3y agoNo, you yourself said it can only do so in-context.