>Does nobody else find it even slightly on-the-nose that the guy behind the TF fork just happens to also run a devops company himself? Not even a little bit. Y

>Does nobody else find it even slightly on-the-nose that the guy behind the TF fork just happens to also run a devops company himself? Not even a little bit. Yours is a really strange take, in fact. Of course it's the DevOps ecosystem forking widely used OSS DevOps tools when those tools' owners decide to move to a non-OSS license. >> Blatantly take someone else’s work How does one "take" open source software? >> mobilise the community by calling them hostile because of licensing The license change caused that mobilization. >> spin up a business to build on the community >> make bank Again, what a strange take. TF and Vault are tools. These businesses are selling stuff built with/for these tools, not the tools themselves. > Now I’m not saying that what’s happened, but I am saying it sure does smell funny. Honestly it reads a lot like you are casting aspersions for no discernible reason.